INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
Siddhartha Nautiyal, J, Narendra Prasad Sinha, ACJ
Vibrant Advertising Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds of appeal against disallowance. (Para 2) |
| 2. facts regarding the original assessment. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's observations and reasoning. (Para 4) |
| 4. final decision and outcome. (Para 5 , 6) |
PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, (in short “Ld. PCIT”), Ahmedabad vide order dated 30.03.2025 passed for A.Y. 2020-21.
2. The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:
“Order passed u/s 263 of the Act is bad in law and without jurisdiction:
1. erred in passing the order u/s 263 of Act without providing an Opportunity of being heard on the issue for which assessment is set aside;
2. erred in setting aside the assessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act by the Faceless assessing officer as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue without appreciating that such an action can be taken only by PCIT having jurisdiction under Faceless regime;
3. erred in setting aside the assessment completed u/s. 143(3) rrw.s 144B of the Act for a debatable issue of allowability of deduction under section 80G on donations made as a part of CSR e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.