INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
Anikesh Banerjee, J, Prabhash Shankar, ACJ
Essar Steel Metal Trading Limited – Appellant
Versus
DCIT, Circle 6(1)(1), Mumbai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. adequate opportunity for representation is essential. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. counsel's inability to represent due to medical emergencies. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. restoration for fair adjudication based on procedural fairness. (Para 6) |
| 4. final order allows appeal for statistical purposes. (Para 7) |
Assessee by : Shri Tarang Mehta Respondent by : Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR Date of hearing : 04/08/2025 Date of pronouncement : 06/08/2025 O R D E R Per Anikesh Banerjee (JM):
Essar Steel Metal Trading Limited (earlier known as Edwell Metal and Trading Limited), Essar House, 11, KK Marg, Tulsiwadi, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai-400 034 PAN: AABCE4851F
vs
DCIT, Circle 6(1)(1), Mumbai Room No.563B 5th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan Maharishi Karve Road, Mumbai- 400 020
APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
The instant appeal of the assesse is filed against the order of the National Faceless appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short, ‘the Ld. CIT(A)] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2020-21, date of order 11/03/2025. The impugned order emanated from the order of the Learned Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 6(1)(1), Mumbai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.