2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 4753
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HYDERABAD BENCH)
Shri Vijay Pal Rao, VP, Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, AM
Assessee – Appellant
Versus
CIT (A) NFAC Delhi – Respondent
ITA No.1096/Hyd/2024
For the Appellant: Learned Counsel
For the Respondent: Learned DR
Tax liability for gaming income must be determined based on gross receipts; retrospective application of amendments requires explicit legislative intent.
Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 58(4), 115BB, and 115BBJ - Income from gaming activities - Tax liability determined based on gross receipts - Introduction of section 115BBJ with retrospective effect debated - Court upheld provisions as prospective, emphasizing that unless expressly stated, amendments should not affect past transactions. (Paras 38-40)
(B) Taxation Principle - Doctrine of real income - Emphasized that income from specified sources must be treated per legislative provisions without allowing losses to offset winnings - Court supported the fixed rate on gross winnings as per legislative intent. (Paras 8, 9)
Facts of the case:
The assessee earned winnings from an online gaming platform but claimed losses against the gross amount, which was denied by the Assessing Officer claiming statutory provisions.
Findings of Court:
Amendment to the Income Tax Act concerning online gaming was not found applicable retrospectively, thus emphasizing tax based solely on gross receipts.
Issues: The primary issue concerned the retrospective applicability of the newly introduced section and whether the doctrine of real income could apply.
Ratio Decidendi: The tribunal reinforced that legislative changes concerning gross winnings from gaming are prospective in nature unless specifically mentioned otherwise.
Result: Appeal dismissed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments on retrospective application of taxation provisions. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 2. claim of net loss against gross income disputed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. assessment principles articulated. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. court's position on retrospective vs prospective taxation. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final order of dismissal. (Para 12) |
आदेश/ORDER
Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 06/09/2024 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, for the A.Y.2022-23.
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
3. The assessee has also filed a petition for admission of additional ground which reads as under:
“Without prejudice to the grounds, the learned CIT (A) is not justified in confirming the addition of Rs.1,86,60,850/- made by learned Assessing Officer being gross receipts from gaming activity u/s 115BB, ignoring the fact that the amendment made vide insertion of section 115BBJ w.e.f. 01/04/2023 is clarificatory in nature and Hence, the net receipts only can be brought to tax”.
4. The assessee is a private sector salaried employee stated to have an annual income less than five lakh rupees and no other income than salary. The assessee filed his return of income for the year under consideration on 26/07/2022 declaring total income of Rs.4,27,850/-. The Assessing Officer noted that in the return of income, the assessee has not disclosed any income winning from M/s. Gameskraft Technologies (P) Ltd platform. The assessee filed his reply and submitted the statement of transactions with the Gameskraft Technologies (P) Ltd (Rummy Culture) which shows a gross winning amount during the year of Rs.1,86,60,852/- against which the assessee claimed setting of loss from the game to the tune of Rs.2,01,37,400/- and thereby claimed a net loss of Rs.14,94,548/- from online gaming activities. The Assessing Officer denied the setting of the loss against the winning amount while passing the assessment order in view of the provisions of section 58(4) r.w.s. 115BB of the I.T. Act and held that in case of the income from other sources, no deduction in respect of any expenses and allowances is allowable in computing income by way of winning from inter alia card games and other games and gross receipt is taxable @ 30% as per section 115BB of the Act.
5. The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer before the learned CIT (A) but could not succeed.
6. Before the Tribunal, the learned Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee produced the profit and loss account statement issued by the Gameskraft Technologies (P) Ltd placed at page 50 & 51 of the paper book which shows the net result of the online gaming activity is loss of Rs.14,94,548/-. Thus, the learned Counsel for the assessee has submitted that only the net result of the gaming activities has to be taken into consideration and therefore, the provisions of section 58(4) of the Act cannot be pressed into service for taking only the gross winning amount to tax @ 30% as per the provisions of Section 115BB of the Act. Before the Tribunal, the learned Counsel for the assessee has given much emphasis on the amended provisions of the Act vide the Finance Act, 2023 whereby Section 115BB J has been introduced w.e.f. A.Y 2024-25 and corresponding section 194BA for TDS effective from 01/04/2023. He has submitted that these 2 provisions specifically govern the taxation of the income from online game. This newly introduced regime replaced the earlier arbitrary framework that provide charging of tax on the gross winning amount without recognizing the loss or entire cost. Section 115BB J introduced the concept of new net winning which more accurately reflects the true economic income accruing to a player. The learned Counsel for the assessee has further submitted that the explanatory memorandum to the Finance Bill 2023 acknowledges that the earlier provisions were inadequate to address the unique transactional nature of online games where th