INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
Naveen Chandra, AM
Bain and Company – Appellant
Versus
The Dy. C.I.T – Respondent
ORDER
PER NAVEEN CHANDRA, AM :-
These two captioned appeals by the assessee are directed against the order u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] dated 31.03.2023 for A.Y 2020-21 and dated 28.08.2023 for A.Y 2021-22.
ITA No. 1677/DEL/2023 [A.Y 2020-21]
2. Grounds raised by the assessee read as under:
1.That the Ld. Assessing Officer ('AO') erred on facts and in law in assessing the income of the Appellant at Rs. 144,48,50,120/- vide Final Assessment Order dated 31 March 2023 as against the returned income of Rs.27,57,87,110/- declared by the Appellant.
GROUNDS PERTAINING TO MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
2.That the Ld. AO/ Dispute Resolution Panel ('DRP') erred on facts and in law in holding that the fee for management consulting services amounting to Rs.49,79,77,135/-received by the Appellant from Bain & Company India Private Limited, its wholly owned subsidiary (hereinafter referred to as 'Bain India') is in the nature of 'Fees for Included Services' ('FIS') under Article 12(4)(a) of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ('DTAA') without appreciating that management consultancy services are not ancillary or subsidiary to the enjoyment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.