INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
Siddhartha Nautiyal, J, BRR Kumar, VP
Kad Steel Rolling Mills – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Pune vide order dated 29.01.2025 passed for A.Y. 2013-
14.
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. Ld. CIT(A) NFAC has erred in confirming the order of A.O. levying penalty U/s. 201(1) of Rs. 42,924 and interest u/s. 201(1A) of Rs. 40,866 aggregating Rs. 83,790/- for late submission of Forms 15G and 15H for non-deduction of TDS from payment of interest to depositors. In as much as, Ld. A.O. as well Hon. CIT(A) has not disputed that: i. Form No. 15G and 15H are filed. There is delay of 3 months. ii. The deductees and assessed to tax and have paid tax as per Return of Income filed. iii. The interest U/s. 201(1A) is wrongly charged since there is no liability to deduct tax. iv. The marginal delay is technical default and in view of the above facts TDS U/s. 201(1)
and interest U/s. 201(1A) cannot be levied.”
3. The brief facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer (TDS) initiated proceedings under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) on the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.