SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 5134

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HYDERABAD BENCH)
GAYATRI ENERGY VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
ACIT. CIRCLE-2(1) HYDERABAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of appeal and delay in filing (Para 1 , 2)
2. contentions on condonation of delay (Para 3 , 4)
3. assessee's loss and interest payment (Para 5 , 6)
4. framework for interest deduction under tax laws (Para 8 , 10)
5. conditions for interest allowances on loans (Para 12 , 13)
6. final conclusion and decision on appeal (Para 14 , 15)

ORDER PER MANJUNATHA G. :

The above appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order dated 23.02.2024 of the learned CIT(A)- National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short the “NFAC”], Delhi, relating to the assessment year 2018-2019.

2. CA, K.C. Devdas, Learned Counsel for the Assessee at the very out-set submitted that, there is a delay of 321 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee had filed affidavit explaining the reasons for condonation of the delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. It was the submission of the assessee that, due to the resignation of the concerned officer in charge of the taxation matters whose mail and mobile number were registered on the e-filing portal and since the assessee has not received information from the said officer, the assessee could not file the appeal before the Tribu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top