Back
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
Suchitra Kamble, J, Makarand V. Mahaadekar, ACJ
SHRI UMEDKUMAR MANDIR TRUST NADIAD – Appellant
Versus
THE CIT(EXEMPTION) AHMEDABAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the trust's activities is contested. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. procedural errors in cit(e)'s handling of evidence. (Para 4 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. insufficient examination of genuineness in proceedings. (Para 7 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. appeal allowed, case remanded for fresh adjudication. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
आदेश/ORDER
PER MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, AM:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 14.12.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(E)”], rejecting the assessee’s application in Form No. 10AB for approval under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961[hereinafter referred to as “the Act”].
Facts of the Case
2. The assessee is a public charitable trust created by a trust deed dated 26.05.1905. The trust filed an application in Form No. 10AB on 28.06.2024 seeking approval under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Act. The trust had already been granted provisional approval from 31.05.2021, which was valid up to A.Y. 2024–25. During the course of proceedings, the Learned CIT(Exemption) issued a letter dated 17.09.2024 calling for details, which were furnished by the assessee vide reply dated 02.10.2024
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
