Back
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JODHPUR BENCH)
RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM, DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM
SRI BIJAYNAGAR KRAY VIKRAYA SAHAKARI SAMITI LTD. BIKANER – Appellant
Versus
ADDT./JT/DY.CIT/ITO NFAC DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the appeal and assessment. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. grounds of appeal raised by the assessee. (Para 2) |
| 3. cit(a)'s decision on interest income. (Para 4) |
| 4. arguments regarding discrepancies in judicial decorum and legal references. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. court observations on the application of law and judicial precedent. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. final order and conclusion of the appeal. (Para 12) |
ORDER
PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM (cid:1)
This appeal filed by assessee is arising out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 20.10.2023 [here in after “ld.CIT(A)(NFAC)”] for assessment year 2018-19 which in turn arise from the order dated 20.04.2021 passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, by the AO.
2. In this appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds: -
“ 1. That the order passed by the Income Tax Officer and sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is illegal and against the law.
2. That the order sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) are not justified and bad in law because assessee society is fulfilling the requirement of law and such the claim of deduction was in accordanc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
