INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “F”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 7802/Del/2019 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)

Ms Priyanka Kumaar, Vs. ITO, D-14, 2^nd Floor, Ward-30(5), Nehru Enclave, New Delhi Kalkaji, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

PAN: AHGPA8267J Assessee by : Shri K. Sampath, Adv Shri V. Rajakumar, Adv Revenue by: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 12/02/2024 Date of pronouncement 19/04/2024

O R D E R

PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:

1. The appeal in ITA No.7802/Del/2019 for AY 2014-15, arises out of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), 33, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] in Appeal No. 678/2018-19 dated 26.07.2019 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 19.12.2016 by the Assessing Officer, ITO, Ward-30(5), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).

2. The only issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the ld.CIT(A) was justified in confirming the addition made by the ld. AO in the sum of Rs 72,32,260/- towards cash deposits made in the bank account in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.

3. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The assessee is engaged in the activities of Tarot and Vastu Consultancy together with purchase and sale of the pertinent items relevant to its consultancy services. The assessee is a qualified Tarot Reader and an expert in Vastu Sciences. She had been conferred a Ph.D Degree from the Open International University for Complimentary Medicines in Jan 2001. She had also secured a Diploma in the Interior Design from the South Delhi Polytechnic for Women. She had attended a course at the All India Federation of Astrologers Societies in 2009 in Tarot Reading. Besides she has Certificates of Association from other similar bodies such as Crystal Healing, Interior Design and Vastu Consultation and Hypnosis & Self Hypnosis classes and similar others. She has been delivering lectures as an expert at various places on these subjects. The return of income for the Asst Year 2014-15 was filed by the assessee u/s 44AD of the Act on a turnover of Rs 45,15,930/- with resultant income of 8% thereof at Rs 3,74,155/-. The assessee furnished the bank statements before the ld. AO. The bank statements revealed that assessee had received RTGS payments for the services rendered by her to different parties at different times and at various locations namely Jalandhar, Shri Ganga Nagar, Jaipur, Firozpur, Guwahati, Ludhiana, Amritsar, Saharanpur, Faridabad, Varanasi, Shahjahanpur, Allahabad, Udham Singh Nagar, Panipat, Karnal etc. The assessee had also received fees from certain clients in cash. Hence the income of the assessee comprises of both cash and cheque fees received from clients. The assessee gave the list of its clients before the ld. AO. Notice u/s 133(6) of the Act was issued to some of the clients of the assessee. The clients denied having any connection with the assessee. Accordingly, the ld. AO was not satisfied with the explanations of the assessee. The assessee explained the cash deposits made in the bank account were out of cash fees received from the clients and cash withdrawals made in the bank account, which was sought to be disbelieved by the ld. AO. The ld. AO proceeded to add the cash deposits made in the bank account in the sum of Rs 72,32,370/- in the assessment which was upheld by the ld. CIT(A).

4. The educational qualification and the other qualifications listed above are not disputed by the revenue before us. The evidences to this effect are enclosed in the paper book filed before us. The only logical source of revenue for the assessee would be out of rendition of the aforesaid services pursuant to her qualification. It is not in dispute that the assessee had declared her income in the return in accordance with the provisions of secti