Back
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JAIPUR BENCH)
RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM
GOVIND SAINI JAIPUR – Appellant
Versus
ITO JAIPUR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal stems from an order confirming income tax additions related to cash deposits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the taxpayer's operations and documentation regarding cash deposits were scrutinized. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. the argument regarding the validity of revenue from service transactions was presented. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. the tribunal found sufficient evidence to justify the cash deposits as legitimate. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM
The present appeal arises on account of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 04/09/2023 [here in after ld. NFAC] for assessment year 2017-18. The said order in turn arise from the order dated 21.12.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, by ITO, Ward 7(2), Jaipur.
2. In this appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds: -
“1. That the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law as well as on facts in confirming the addition of Rs. 2237511/- on account of amount received in cash from persons for online fund transfer through novapay online portal and deposited in Bank.
2. That the appellant craves the right to add, delete, amend or abandon any of the grounds of appeal eit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
