INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHANDIGARH BENCH)
Vikram Singh Yadav, AM, Aakash Deep Jain, VP
BALWINDER SINGH BAJWA SANGRUR – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD SUNAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interpretation of cash deposits from agricultural land sale. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. established nexus between sale proceeds and bank deposits. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. decision to allow appeal based on established evidence. (Para 12 , 14) |
आदशे/Order
PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. :
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, dt. 30/03/2023 pertaining to Assessment Year 2011-12.
2. In the present appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The Ld. CIT(A) was not right in sustaining the addition of Rs. 34,37,500/- u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act by not treating the entire cash receipt of Rs. 53,00,000/- as sale proceeds of agricultural land which is exempt from taxation.
2. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and facts in not allowing to withdraw the Ground No. 2 that the AO has wrongly applied the provisions of section 144 of the Income Tax Act whereas the assessment has been completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147. The Ld. CIT(A) has also erred in law by wrongly justifying that order u/s 143(3) cannot be passed as notice u/s 143(2) was not issued on account of non-filing of return of income in response to notice u/s 148. However, me
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.