INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
Pavan Kumar Gadale, JM, Girish Agrawal, AM
WORLEY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX 2 MUMBAI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's observations on the legitimacy of the ao's proceedings. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 2. final judgement regarding the appeal and its outcome. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM:
The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT)-2, Mumbai passed u/sec 263 of the Act. The assessee has raised the fallowing grounds of appeal :
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax- 2 ('Ld. PCIT') Grounds on validity of proceedings under section 263
1. erred in holding that the assessment order dated 8 April 2021 passed under section 143(3) read with section 143(3A) & (3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. Grounds on Merits: Allowability of deduction under section 80G of the Act in respect of contributions towards Corporate Social Responsibility ('CSR') of Rs. 48,59,170:
2. erred in directing the Assessing Officer to conduct requisite enquiries in relation to allowability of deduction under section 80G in respect of donations made to eligible institutions and forming part of CSR contributions, and to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.