INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
DCIT CC-3(2) MUMBAI AIR INDIA BUILDING MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ARUN JAIN MUMBAI – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA no.2731/Mum./2023 (Assessment Year : 2021–22)
DCIT, CC-3(2)
Room No. 1913, 19th Floor ……………. Appellant Air India Building, Nariman Point Mumbai-400021 v/s Arun Jain
11, Vikash Park, Jalpankhi Co-op, HSG, Society Ltd, ……………. Respondent Juhu Tara Road, Juhu, Mumbai-400049 PAN – AAFPJ0335G Assessee by : Shri Jay Bhansali Revenue by : Shri Sunny Kachhwaha Date of Hearing – 30/05/2024 Date of Order –07/06/2024
O R D E R
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M.
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue challenging the impugned order dated 09/05/2023, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2021-22.
2. In its appeal, the Revenue has raised the following grounds:–
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition made u/s 69A amounting to Rs.3,95,15,327/- on account of sales made to M/s. Gulathi Enterprises reflected against the PAN of the assessee.
2. On the facts and circumst
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.