INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI BENCH)
Mahavir Singh, VP, Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, AM
N.V. Balaji – Appellant
Versus
D. Hema Bhupal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment years and appeals context. (Para 1) |
| 2. final findings and tax treatment of income. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. tax evasion concerns regarding charitable activity. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER
Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
1.1 Aforesaid appeals by assessee for Assessment Years (AY) 2009- 10 to 2017-18 arises out of a common order passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18, Chennai [CIT(A)] on 03-08- 2023 in the matter of separate assessments framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] for all these years. The appeals ITA Nos.1087 to 1095/Chny/2023 are quantum appeals whereas appeals ITA Nos.1096 to 1098/Chny/2023 are penalty appeals for AYs 2013-14 to 2015-16.
1.2 Facts as well as issues in quantum appeals are substantially the same in all the years. The impugned order is a common order. First we take up ITA No.1088/Chny/2023 for AY 2010-11. Upon perusal of case records, it could be seen that for this year, an order was passed by Tribunal vide ITA No.1080/Mds/2015 on 18-03-2016 against an order passed by revisionary authority u/s 263 on 27-03-2015. The substantive adjudication of Tribunal was as under: -
12. Now coming to the merit of the appeal filed by the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.