SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 3398

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JAIPUR BENCH)
SMT. RAMPYARI SARADDHANA – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD-2(3) AJMER – Respondent


ORDER 

PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM :

This appeal by the assessee through Legal Representative is directed against the order of ld. CIT (A), Ajmer dated 19th August, 2019 for the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee has raised the following grounds :-

“ 1. Ld. CIT (Appeals) erred in law as well as on facts of the case by confirming action of the AO in issuing notice u/s 148 in the name of the deceased assessee.

2. Ld. CIT (Appeals) erred in law as well as on facts of the case by confirming action of the AO in estimating Agriculture Income of the assessee at Rs. 100000/-, instead of Rs. 2,50,000/- as declared by the assessee in Return of Income.

3. Ld. CIT (Appeals) erred in law as well as on facts of the case by confirming addition of Rs. 5,92,000/- by treating amount deposited in Bank Account of the assessee as unexplained deposit.

The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, delete or modify any of the above grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing.”

The hearing of the appeal is concluded through Video Conference due to prevailing condition of COVID 19 pandemic.

Ground No. 1 is regarding validity of notice issued under section 148 in the name of the deceased assessee.

2. The asses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top