SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 2364

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
MADHUKAR PANDURANG BHOIR MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2) THANE – Respondent


ORDER

PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M)

These two appeals in ITA No.6100&6124/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2011- 2012 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Mumbai both dated 04.07.2017 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3)of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 28.03.2014 by the ld. Income Tax Officer – 1(2), Thane (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).

2. The only issue to be decided in this appeal of both the assessee as well as the revenue is as to whether the long term capital gains of Rs 1,09,75,319/- could be brought to tax in the facts and circumstances of the case. Both the assessee as well as the revenue are in appeal before us with regard to determination of quantum of long term capital gains and hence both the appeals are taken up together and disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience.

3. The assessee is an autorickshaw driver and had filed his return of income for the Asst Year 2011-12 on 30.3.2013 declaring total income of Rs 64,801/-. The assessee was never assessed to income tax. He had filed his return for the Asst Year 2011-12 in view of the fact that he along with other family

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top