Back
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, J, SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, ACJ
High Voit Electicals Pvt Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
ITO, Ward – 1 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. multiple appeals filed against penalties imposed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. failure to comply with notices results in penalties. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. non-filing of returns leads to penalty assessments. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. appellant did not provide sufficient evidence to contest penalties. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. appeals were ultimately dismissed based on established violations. (Para 12) |
ORDER
Per Bench.:
These fourappeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the different impugned orders passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) / CIT(A) for the assessment year 2013-14.
2. Since all the four appeals are belongs to one assessee, hence, they have been clubbed, heard together and consolidated order is being passed forthe sake of convenience and brevity.
ITA No. 4462/Mum/2025, A.Y 2013-14
3. At the time of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee when the case was called repeatedly. Even no application for seeking adjournment has been filed. From the records, we noticed that assessee had twice taken adjournments on one or the other reasons and the present date of hearing was fixed in the presence of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
