INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (RAJKOT BENCH)
DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACJ, SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, J
Babubhai Kanjibhai Sakariya – Appellant
Versus
ITO, Wd 1(2)(1), Rajkot – Respondent
आदेश/ORDER Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM:
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2016-17, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), dated 11/02/2025, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer dated 21/12/2018 u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, are as follows;
“1. The order passed by the Id. Commissioner of Income-tax, 1 National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC) is bad in law and invalid.
2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts as also in law in upholding the addition of Rs. 94,81,129/- made for interest granted by the Competent Court as per sec. 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 , as enhanced compensation.
3. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts as also in law in upholding the protective addition of Rs. 71,10,846/-made in hands of the appellant, as substantive addition, for interest pertaining to other co-owners
4. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts as also in law in upholding the addition, relying upon decision of the Hon'ble Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.