INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (RAJKOT BENCH)
Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM, Dinesh Mohan Sinha, JM
Jitendrasinh Zala – Appellant
Versus
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
ORDER
Per, Dr. A. L. Saini, AM:
By way of this appeal, the assessee has challenged the correctness of the order dated 22.10.2024 passed by the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (in short “Ld PCIT”) under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), for the assessment year 2020-21. Grievances raised by the assessee, which, being interconnected, will be taken up together, are as follows:
2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows:
“1. The Ld. PCIT erred in law as well as on fact in assuming jurisdiction u/s.263 of the Act.
2. The Ld. PCIT erred in law as well as on fact in holding that order passed u/s 143(3) by Ld.AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.”
3. The facts of the case which can be stated quite shortly are as follows: The assessee has filed original return of income for assessment year under consideration, on 19/01/2021, declaring total income of Rs. 16,61,010/-. The said return of income was revised on 03/02/2021, declaring total income at Rs. 15,85,390/-. Thereafter, the case of the assessee for the assessment year under consideration was selected for complete scrutiny assessment. Accordingly, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.