IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH-RANCHI VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member and Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2013-14 ITO, Ranchi………..…………….…….…...................................……….……Appellant vs.

Amba Carbonisation Pvt. Ltd ……....….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent

21, Ashok Bhawan, Kali Asthan Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

[PAN: AADCA7460J]

Appearances by:

Shri Kanhaiya Lal Kanak, CIT, appeared on behalf of the appellant.

Shri Devesh Poddar, AR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent.

Date of concluding the hearing : December 18, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : January 06, 2026

ORDER

Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:

This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “ld. CIT(A)”) dated 15.01.2024 passed under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).

2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of special smokeless coal/coke. The assessee also derives income by way of interest on bank deposits. As per information available with the Income-tax Department, it was noticed that the assessee’s bank accounts reflected substantial cash deposits, which were allegedly withdrawn immediately through RTGS/NEFT transactions. It was further observed that there existed a difference between the turnover disclosed by the assessee in the return of income and the total credits appearing in the bank accounts. On the basis of the above information, the Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Act dated 16.03.2021. Subsequently, without concluding or formally dropping the earlier reassessment proceedings, the AO issued another notice under section 148 of the Act dated 31.03.2021 for the same assessment year and on identical reasons, thereby initiating parallel reassessment proceedings. In response to the notices issued under section 148 of the Act, the assessee filed its return of income on 18.08.2021, declaring total income of ₹4,86,595/-. The filing of return in response to the notice under section 148 of the Act has been duly acknowledged by the AO in the assessment records. Prior to the reassessment, the assessee had filed its return of income under section 139 of the Act. The case was selected for scrutiny, and assessment under section 143(3) of the Act was completed by order dated 14.10.2015, determining total income at ₹6,84,600/-. During the reassessment proceedings, the AO issued notices under section 142(1) of the Act on 30.06.2021 and again on 22.02.2022, calling upon the assessee to furnish various details. According to the AO, the assessee did not comply with the notices and neither furnished the requisite information nor sought adjournment. On account of alleged non- compliance, the AO also initiated penalty proceedings after issuing notice under section 273B of the Act, proposing levy of penalty under section 270A/270AA of the Act. The assessee raised objections against the reopening of the assessment proceedings vide objections dated 15.02.2022, which were duly replied to on 22.02.2022. The assessee also requested reasonable opportunity to furnish details, contending that the notices were issued at very short intervals. The AO, however, proceeded to complete the reassessment based on the material available on record and passed the assessment order dated 30.03.2022 under section 147 read with section 144B of the Act, making an addition of ₹13,64,83,677/- under section 69A of the Act, treating the same as unexplained money. A perusal of the assessment records reveals that two notices under section 148 of the Act dated 16.03.2021 and

31.03.2021 were issued for the same assessment year. In the proceedings initiated pursuant to notice dated 16.03.2021, a notice under secti