SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 298

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SARAYU KRISHNA KAMAT PIRAMAL CHAMBER – Appellant
Versus
DCIT CIRCLE 22(1) PIRAMAL CHAMBER MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A No.6738/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2018-19)

Sarayu Krishna Kamat 1061 Om Apartment, Dr M B Raut Road, Shivaji Park Dadar Mumbai-400028 PAN : AAHPK4713D vs DCIT Circle 22(1), Mumbai Piramal Chambers Mumbai- 400012
APPELLANT RESPONDENT
Assessee by : Shri Sampat Nagap Respondent by : Shri Swapnil Choudhary (SR AR)

Date of hearing : 24/12/2026 Date of pronouncement : 07/01/2026 O R D E R Per: Anikesh Banerjee (JM):

The instant appeal of the assessee preferred against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [for brevity, ‘Ld.CIT(A)’] order passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, ‘the Act) for the Assessment Year 2018-19, date of order 26/08/2025. The impugned order emanated from the order of the National e- Assessment Centre, Delhi (for brevity, ‘the Ld.AO’) order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.

143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act, date of order 10/04/2021.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee individual capacity filed the return. During the impugned assessment year assessee with the joint o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top