SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1199

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI BENCH)
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4) CHENNAI CHENNAI – Appellant
Versus
RAJAMANI GOBINATH DINDIGUL – Respondent


आदशे / O R D E R PER BENCH:

These appeals preferred by the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee arise from the orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld.CIT(A)‘), Chennai, dated 29.03.2025 for Assessment Years (hereinafter referred to as ‘AY‘) 2014-15 to 2017-18 u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act‘).

2. It is noted that, except for variation in figures, the observations and findings rendered by the lower authorities are verbatim same across all these years and therefore, with the consent of both the parties, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

3. The background facts concerning these appeals are that, the assessee is an individual who runs proprietorship concerns by the name and style M/s Skyway Associates which is engaged in undertaking contract work for underground cables. It is observed that, a search action was conducted u/s 132(4) of the Act in the premises of one, Shri CP Anbunathan [in short ‘CPA’] on 22.04.2016, in the course of which, several diaries/books were seized which inter alia contained notings six (6) account book(

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top