INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
RAVINDRABHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL VADODARA – Appellant
Versus
THE ITO WARD-1(2)(5) NOW ITO WARD-1(2)(2) VADODARA – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
Assessee represented by : Ms. Urvashi Shodhan, AR Revenue represented by : Shri Abhijit, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 27/11/2025 Date of Pronouncement 29/01/2026
O R D E R
PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the “the CIT(A)”] dated 25/04/2025 passed for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16.
2. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The learned CIT (A) has erred in law and on the facts of the appellant's case in confirming addition of ₹1,66,98,526/- under Income from Capital Gain instead of "NIL".
2. The learned CIT (A) ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.