SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1617

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
RAVINDRABHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL VADODARA – Appellant
Versus
THE ITO WARD-1(2)(5) NOW ITO WARD-1(2)(2) VADODARA – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

Assessee represented by : Ms. Urvashi Shodhan, AR Revenue represented by : Shri Abhijit, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 27/11/2025 Date of Pronouncement 29/01/2026

O R D E R

PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the “the CIT(A)”] dated 25/04/2025 passed for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16.

2. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

“1. The learned CIT (A) has erred in law and on the facts of the appellant's case in confirming addition of ₹1,66,98,526/- under Income from Capital Gain instead of "NIL".

2. The learned CIT (A) ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top