INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (PATNA BENCH)
SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY PATNA – Appellant
Versus
AO PATNA – Respondent
ITA 428/PAT/2025[2018-19]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PATNA ‘DB’ BENCH AT KOLKATA
[Virtual Court]
Before
SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
&
SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.: 428/PAT/2025
Assessment Year: 2018-19
Shashi Krishna Educational ITO Exemption, Patna
Avam Welfare Society Vs.
(Appellant) (Respondent)
PAN: AAEAS1921K
Appearances:
Assessee represented by : Pankaj Jyoti, CA.
Department represented by : Md. A H Chowdhury, CIT (DR).
Date of concluding the hearing : 05-January-2026
Date of pronouncing the order : 29-January-2026
ORDER
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the
Addl/JCIT(A)- 6, Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as Ld. ‘Addl/JCIT(A)']
passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as
‘the Act’) for AY 2018-19 dated 19.08.2025.
2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following
grounds of appeal:
“1. That the order passed by the Learned CIT(A) is bad in law and
unsustainable on facts.
2. That the Learned CIT(A) erred in upholding denial of exemption u/s 11
ignoring that the appellant is duly registered u/s 12A and had furnished
the Audit Report in Form 10B before completion of assessment.
3. That the Learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that delay in filing Form 10B
is a procedural/technical lapse and the same stands condonable in view of
various CBDT Circulars and judicial pronouncements (including CIT v.
Xavier’s Kelavam Mandal Pvt. Ltd. [Taxmann], Trustees of Tulsidas Gopalji
##PAGE2##Page | 2
ITA No.: 428/PAT/2025
Assessment Year: 2018-19
Shashi Krishna Educational Avam Welfare Society.
Charitable Trust v. CIT 1994 207 ITR 368 Bom.), wherein it has been held
that exemption cannot be denied merely due to late filing of audit report
when substantive conditions are fulfilled.
4. That the Learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the entire gross receipts are
taxable without allowing expenditure, whereas it is settled law that only
surplus of income over expenditure is taxable even if exemption is denied
(CIT v. Society for Promotion of Education, Adventure Sport and
Conservation of Environment (2016) 382 ITR 6 (SC)).
5. That the authorities below failed to appreciate that the appellant had in
fact applied Rs. 1,06,33,000/- towards revenue expenditure, further
applied Rs. 13,50,900/- towards capital expenditure (excluding borrowed
funds), and set apart Rs. 7,92,441/- (within the 15% permissible limit u/s
U(l)(a)) for charitable purposes, and therefore the conditions of section 11
were duly complied with.
6. That the demand of Rs. 53,13,260/- is unjustified, arbitrary, and
deserves to be quashed.
7. That the appellant craves leave to add, alter or withdraw any ground of
appeal at the time of hearing.”
3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an AOP and had
filed the return of income for AY 2018-19 on 11.09.2018 showing ‘NIL’
income. The return was first processed u/s 143(1) of the Act making
certain adjustments/raising tax payable over and above the returned
income/tax payable. Against the said Intimation, the assessee filed a
rectification request which was rejected by the CPC vide its order u/s
154 of the Act dated 02.01.2020. Aggrieved with the assessment order,
the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who vide, order dated
19.08.2025, dismissed the appeal of the assessee by holding as under:
“5.1 I have carefully gone through the Intimation u/s 143(1), the grounds of
appeal and submission made by the appellant in this regard. Briefly stating
facts of the case is that the appellant filed return of income which was
processed u/s 143(1) by CPC making certain adjustments over and above
the returned income. The only issue involved in this case is that the
appellant which is an AOP had claimed exemption u/s 11 of the I.T. Act
against its income which was disallowed in the Intimation u/s 143(1).
5.2 All the grounds of appeal raised by the appellant are against denying
exemption u/s 11 of the I.T. Act and also against taxing the entire receipts
##PAGE3##Page | 3
ITA N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.