2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1798
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (INDORE BENCH)
URBAN ADMINISTRATION AMD DEVELOPMENT BHOPAL – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) BHOPAL – Respondent
ITA 477/IND/2025[2015-16]
##PAGE1##
, ,
आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण इंदौर(cid:586)ायपीठ इंदौर
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
INDORE BENCH, INDORE
BEFORE SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND
SHRI PARESH M JOSHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No.477/ Ind/ 2025
(AY: 2015-16)
Directorate of Urban बनाम/ Deputy
Administrations & Development, Vs. Commissioner of
Nagar Palika Bhawan, 6 No.Bus Income Tax-TDS,
Stop, R.S.Market, Bhopal
S.O. Huzur, Bhopal(M.P.)
(TAN: BPLDO1618B)
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Assessee by Shri Sapan Usrethe, Adv. &
Ms. Apoorva Garg, CA
Revenue by Shri Anup Singh, CIT DR
Date of Hearing 21.01.2026
Date of Pronouncement 30.01.2026
आदेश / O R D E R
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of
the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this Tribunal as & by way of
second appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing
Number:-ITBA/ APL/ S/ 250/ 2024-25/ 1074816130(1) dated
21.03.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/ s 250 of the Act,
which is herein after referred to as the “Impugned order”.
Page 1 of 12
##PAGE2##Directorate of Urban Administration & Development
ITA No. 477/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2015-16
The relevant assessment year is 2015-16 and the
corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2014 to
31.03.2015.
2. Factual Matrix
2.1 That as and by way of an “ Default order” passed u/ s
201(1) & 201(1A) of the Act by the DCIT(TDS), Bhopal
dated 28.12.2021, the assessee was found & deemed to be
an Assessee in Default for Short deduction of Tax of
Rs. 2,98,992/ - u/ s 201(1) of the Act-for AY 2015-16 & as per
provision of section 201(1A), the assessee was held liable to
pay simple interest at the rate of one percent per month on
the amount of Default for AY 2015-16 which was calculated at
Rs. 2,60,123/ -. [CEPT University Ahmedabad] It was also
found out in the order that for AY 2015-16, the assessee-
deductor has made short deduction on payment made to
1. Spatial Decisions, 2. Prem Choudhary, 3. K.N. Gutgutia
& Co. at Rs. 81431/ - u/ s 201(1) of the Act. The interest was
worked out at Rs. 71,531/ - u/ s 201(1A) on said amount. For
non-deduction of TDS on interest payment to HUDCO for the
Page 2 of 12
##PAGE3##Directorate of Urban Administration & Development
ITA No. 477/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2015-16
period prior to 20.03.20219 [194A] short deduction was
worked out at Rs. 3,42,61,000/ - u/ s 201(1A) and interest
thereon was worked out at Rs. 3,18,61,000/ - u/ s 201(1A)
For the payment made to “ CEPT University” the TDS was
found to be deducted at 4% [194J] instead of 10%. The TDS
Certificate downloaded from TRACES (Certificate No. III
5DE160H) it was also found that it is valid from 24.11.2014
to 31.03.2015. However, on 26Q of 3rd Quarter the assessee
deductor had paid Rs. 48,62,400/ - on 01.10.2014. Therefore
lower TDS Certificate (supra) issued to the CEPT University
is valid from 24.11.2014 to 31.03.2015 & not applicable on
payment made before 24.11.2014 (payment made on
01.10.2014. TDS was deducted at 4% instead of 10% [194J].
The Assessee was in Default u/ s 201(1) at Rs. 2,98,992/ - &
u/ s 201(1A) at Rs. 2,60,123/ -. The total amount of Default
for (supra) Non-Deduction of TDS/ irregularity was worked
out at Rs. 6,68,33,877 [u/ s 201(1) & 201(1A)]. The aforesaid
default order dated 28.12.2021 is herein after referred to as
the “Impugned Default Order”
Page 3 of 12
##PAGE4##Directorate of Urban Administration & Development
ITA No. 477/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2015-16
2.2 The Assessee is Directorate of Urban Administrations
Development, Bhopal which is Dept. of State Government of
M.P. & is looking after all the administrative work carried out
by various statutory bodies like Nagar Parishad, Nagar Nigam
& Nagar Panchayats of M.P. It also carries out development of
infrastructure, give guarantees Grants etc.
2.3 That the assessee being Aggrieved by the aforesaid
“Impugned Default Order” prefers the first appeal u/ s 246A
of the Act before the Ld. CIT(A) who by the “Impugned Order”
has dismissed the 1st appeal of the Assessee on the grounds &
reasons stated