SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1818

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
VIJAY RAAZ GODBUNDAR ROAD DIST. THANE – Appellant
Versus
WARD 16(1)(5) MUMBAI – Respondent


(cid:1)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, AM AND MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM ITA No. 3416/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2020-21)

(Assessment Year: 2020-21)

(Assessment Year: 2020-21)

(Assessment Year: 2020-21)

(Assessment Year: 2020-21)

(Assessment Year: 2020-21)

(Assessment Year: 2020-21)

Assessee by : Shri Manish Trivedi Respondent by : Shri Vivek Perampurna (CIT-DR)

Date of Hearing : 07.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 30.01.2026

O R D E R

Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:

This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, PCIT, Mumbai – 8 (‘ld. PCIT’ for short), passed u/s.263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act'), pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ for short) 2020-21.

2. It is observed that the assessee has filed the present appeal with a delay of 5 days beyond the period of limitation for which the assessee has filed an application along with affidavit for condoning the said delay. On perusal of the same, we deem it fit to condone the delay for the reason that the assessee had ‘sufficient cause’ for the said delay. Delay condoned.

3. The assessee has raised the following gro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top