INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
VIJAY RAAZ GODBUNDAR ROAD DIST. THANE – Appellant
Versus
WARD 16(1)(5) MUMBAI – Respondent
ITA 3416/MUM/2025[2020-2021]
##PAGE1##
(cid:1)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
AND
MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM
ITA No. 3416/Mum/2025
(Assessment Year: 2020-21)
Vijay Raaz Ward 16(1)(5), Mumbai
Cottage No. B-13, Cosmos Hawaiian,
Near Blue Roof Club, Ghodbunder Vs.
Road, Thane, West 400 601.
PAN/GIR No. ADLPR8784L
(Appellant) : (Respondent
Assessee by : Shri Manish Trivedi
Respondent by : Shri Vivek Perampurna (CIT-DR)
Date of Hearing : 07.11.2025
Date of Pronouncement : 30.01.2026
O R D E R
Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, PCIT, Mumbai – 8 (‘ld. PCIT’ for short),
passed u/s.263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act'), pertaining to the Assessment
Year (‘A.Y.’ for short) 2020-21.
2. It is observed that the assessee has filed the present appeal with a delay of 5 days beyond
the period of limitation for which the assessee has filed an application along with
affidavit for condoning the said delay. On perusal of the same, we deem it fit to condone
the delay for the reason that the assessee had ‘sufficient cause’ for the said delay. Delay
condoned.
##PAGE2##ITA No. 3416/Mum/2025 (A.Y. 2020-21)
Vijay Raaz
3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
The conditions precedent for invoking section 263 not satisfied
1. The learned PCIT erred in invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 when the AO had already
examined the issue in scrutiny proceedings and accepted the claim after due
verification as he failed to bring on record any findings which proves that the order
of learned assessing officer is Erroneous and Prejudicial to the interest of the
Revenue.
2. The order passed u/s 143(3) is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest
of revenue.
Reliance on the general investigation data
3. The learned PCIT erred in invoking jurisdiction under section 263 and relied on
general investigation data as was informed by the Investigation Wing Ahmedabad
without any specific adverse material or findings against the appellant.
No opportunity of cross examination given to the assessee
4. The learned PCIT erred in law by not giving an opportunity to rebut any direct
evidence or statement or findings to the assessee; hence, the revision order violates
principles of natural justice.
Objection raised by the assessee was never refuted or no speaking order passed
under section 263 against the same.
5. The learned PCIT erred in law by invoking provision of section 263 and passed
the order under section 263. He completely ignored the objection raised by the
assessee against the show cause notice proposing the reopening of the assessment
and reassess the income under section 263 in violation of CBDT guidelines of
issuing the speaking order.
No findings recorded how the donation paid by the assessee is non-genuine:
6. The learned PCIT failed to bring on record any findings or evidence as how the
donation is not genuine and how the cash is paid back to the assessee against the
genuine donation as alleged in the order under section 263. The deduction claimed
u/s 80GGC was in compliance with law and based on valid documentary evidence.
Revision under section 263 is based on mere suspicion:
2
##PAGE3##ITA No. 3416/Mum/2025 (A.Y. 2020-21)
Vijay Raaz
7. The revision is based on mere suspicion and constitutes a change of opinion,
which is not a valid ground for exercise of revisional powers.
Impugned Revision order under section 263 is unlawful
8. The impugned order is arbitrary, unlawful and liable to be set aside.
No evidence is brough not record that Apana Desh Political Party is not registered
under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
9. The learned PCIT failed to bring on record any proof or findings that Apana
Desh Political Party is not registered under section 29A of the Representation of
the People Act, 1951against the proof submitted by the assessee of official gazette
of Election Commission of India confirming that the party is registered
unrecognised part
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.