INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AMRITSAR BENCH)
PANKAJ JINDAL CONTRACTOR MANSA – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-I BATHINDA BATHINDA – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
BEFORE SH. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Physical Hearing)
I.T.A. No. 695/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Appellant by Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 16.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement 05.01.2026
ORDER
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT (A), NFAC, Delhi, passed u/s 250 of the Act, 1961 vide order dated 17.10.2024 which has emanated from the order of AO, NFAC, passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act, vide order dated 17.09.2021.
2. Grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in form 36 are as under:
“1. The Ld. CIT(A) NFAC has erred on facts and law in dismissing the appeal of the assessee, vide order u/s 250 of the Act dt.
17.10.2024, filed against the order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act Dt. 12.09.2021 in which the income of the assessee has been assessed at Rs. 71,03,069/- while making the addition of Rs.
43,39,999/-.
2. That the Ld. CIT(A) NFAC has erred
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.