SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 1888

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AMRITSAR BENCH)
PANKAJ JINDAL CONTRACTOR MANSA – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-I BATHINDA BATHINDA – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.

BEFORE SH. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Physical Hearing)

I.T.A. No. 695/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Appellant by Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 16.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement 05.01.2026

ORDER

Per: Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.:

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT (A), NFAC, Delhi, passed u/s 250 of the Act, 1961 vide order dated 17.10.2024 which has emanated from the order of AO, NFAC, passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act, vide order dated 17.09.2021.

2. Grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in form 36 are as under:

“1. The Ld. CIT(A) NFAC has erred on facts and law in dismissing the appeal of the assessee, vide order u/s 250 of the Act dt.

17.10.2024, filed against the order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act Dt. 12.09.2021 in which the income of the assessee has been assessed at Rs. 71,03,069/- while making the addition of Rs.

43,39,999/-.

2. That the Ld. CIT(A) NFAC has erred

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top