SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 2094

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
GOVIND MANSHARAM DINGWA MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER - 22(1)(1) MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI“SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER (AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

(AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17)

O R D E R PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM:

These two appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 30.06.2025 passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘Act’) by the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre[in short, ‘CIT(A), NFAC’], Delhi, for the Assessment Year 2016-17.

3. Since all the issues involved in these appeals are common and identical and belongs to one assessee therefore, they have been clubbed, heard together and consolidated order is being passed. Firstly we shall take up ITA No. 5020/Mum/2025, A.Y 2016-17 as lead case and facts narrated therein.

ITA No. 5020/Mum/2025, A.Y 2016-17 The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under:

“ITA No. 5020/MUM/2025

1. (a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top