SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 2325

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SYKEN SURESH MEHTA MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 19(3)(1) MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Assessment Year: 2022-23)

Suken Suresh Mehta, Income Tax Officer, A-28, Sterling Apartments, 19(3)(1), 38, Peddar Road, Mumbai Cumballa Hills, Vs.

Mumbai- 400026 (Appellant) : (Respondent)

PAN NO. ALGPM 7763H Appellant by : Shri Vijay Mehta, CA And Shri Tarang Mehta, Advocate Respondent by : Shri Anil Kanti Datta, CIT-DR (Appellant) (Respondent)

Date of Hearing : 18.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 14.01.2026 O R D E R Per Saktijit Dey, Vice President:

This is an appeal by the assessee against an order dated 09.10.2025 of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi pertaining to Assessment Year 2022-23.

2. The assessee has raised four grounds in the Memorandum of Appeal. However, at the outset, learned counsel appearing for the assessee, on instructions, did not press Ground Nos. 1 and 2. Accordingly, these two grounds are dismissed as not pressed.

3. In Ground No.3, assessee has challenged the disallowance of Rs.39,80,263/-

claimed towards indexed cost of acquisition of land.

4. Briefly the facts are, the assessee acquired 18,443 sq.ft. of land in Coimbato

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top