INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JODHPUR BENCH)
ITO WARD-1 BHILWARA – Appellant
Versus
SHRI KAMAL KISHORE AGARWAL BHILWARA – Respondent
ITA 381/JODH/2018[2012-13]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
BEFORE DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER
M.A. No. 05/Jodh/2019
(A/o ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018) &
ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018
(Assessment Year 2012-13)
Income Tax Officer, Shri Kamal Kishore Agarwal,
Ward-1, Prop. M/s. Synthetics,
Bhilwara. B-42 to 46, Bhilwara Textile Market,
Bhilwara-311001.
PAN No. ABZPA6445P
Assessee by None.
Revenue by Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT-DR
Date of Hearing 07.01.2026.
Date of Pronouncement 28.01.2026.
ORDER
DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, A.M.:
The captioned miscellaneous application is instituted at the instant of
the department against the Tribunal order in ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018 dated 11-
09-2019 in respect with Assessment years 2012-13 for recalling the said appeal
which was dismissed on account of Low Tax effect.
2. The Ld. Addl. CIT (DR) for the department submitted that at the time of
adjudication of the revenue appeal in ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018 in respect with
Assessment years 2012-13 the appeal of the Department was dismissed on Tax
effect by the Hon’ble Tribunal in view of the enhanced monetary limits by the
CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 as the revised monitory limit
##PAGE2##2
M.A. No. 05/Jodh/2019
(A/o ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018) &
ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018
(Assessment Year 2012-13)
mentioned in the CBDT's circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 are applicable
to all pending appeals. Since in the above appeal, the tax effect involved was
Rs. 86,030/- and accordingly it has been dismissed by the Hon'ble ITAT for Low
Tax Effect.
3. He emphasized that in the above case although the tax effect was below
the monetary limit as given in CBDT's circular even then the appeal before the
Hon'ble ITAT was filed as the issue under consideration arose after acceptance
of a revenue audit objection by the department which was kept in exception
clause being pertaining to deduction claimed u/s 54F of the Act. The Revenue
Audit Objection has been accepted by the Department and hence it wa not
covered in Tax limits of filing appeal before the Tribunal. However, he agreed
that in view of the latest CBDT Circular No.5/ 2024 dated 15 March 2024
presently, the matter is covered under low tax effect as the said exception
clause has been done away.
4. None attended for the assessee.
5. Having heard the Ld. Addl. CIT (DR) and perusal of record we find that
the issue was not covered in Tax effect by CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated
08.08.2019 while the appeal was adjudicated earlier by the Tribunal and
accordingly the MA of the revenue is allowed.
##PAGE3##3
M.A. No. 05/Jodh/2019
(A/o ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018) &
ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018
(Assessment Year 2012-13)
6. However, in view of latest CBDT Circular No.5/ 2024 dated 15 March
2024 as the Ld. DR rightly admitted that presently the issue is covered under
Low Tax Effect. Therefore, he did not press the issue raised by the department
in the quantum appeal for adjudication.
7. Accordingly, in the light of the aforesaid CBDT Circular No.5/ 2024 dated
15 March 2024, the appeal in ITA No. 381/Jodh/2018 is dismissed as
infructuous.
8. In the result M.A. No. 05/Jodh/2019 is allowed and the appeal in ITA No.
381/Jodh/2018 is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28/01/2026.
Sd/- Sd/-
(SUDHIR PAREEK) (DR. MITHA LAL MEENA)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated : 28/01/2026
True Copy
Copies to :
(1) The appellant.
(2) The respondent.
(3) CIT
(4) CIT(A)
(5) Departmental Representative
(6) Guard File
By Order
Assistant Registrar,
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Jodhpur Bench,
Jodhpur.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.