INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
ZEBRA NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER MUMBAI – Respondent
ITA 7497/MUM/2025[2018-19]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT AND
SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 7497/Mum/2025
(Assessment Year: 2018-19)
Zebra Networks Private Limited Income Tax Officer
Unit No.4, Peninsula Corporate Park, Assessment Unit,
Peninsula Chamber, G. K. Marg, Vs. Income Tax Department,
Mumbai-400 013 Mumbai – 400 020
PAN/GIR No. AABCI 6267 P
(Appellant) : (Respondent)
Appellant by : Shri Ketan L Vajani
Respondent by : Shri Swapnil Choudhary – Sr.AR
Date of Hearing : 28.01.2026
Date of Pronouncement : 28.01.2026
O R D E R
Per Saktijit Dey, Vice President:
This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 19.09.2025, passed by National
Faceless Appeal Centre (‘NFAC’ for short), Delhi for the assessment year (A.Y. for short)
2018-19, confirming the penalty imposed of Rs.76,45,696/- u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short).
2. We have heard the parties and perused the materials on record. Briefly the facts are,
the assessee is a resident corporate entity. For the assessment year under dispute, the
assessee had filed its return of income on 30.10.2018, declaring loss of Rs.59,17,484/-. The
return of income so filed by the assessee was selected for scrutiny.
##PAGE2##2
ITA No. 7497/Mum/2025 (A.Y.2018-19)
Zebra Networks Private Limited vs. ITO
3. In course of assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer (A.O. for short) called
for various details and after examining them completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) of the
Act, making the following additions:
a) Unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the Act – Rs.9,89,73,410/-
b) Disallowance of expenses of Rs.12,64,743/-
4. Contesting the additions, the assessee preferred an appeal before ld. First appellate
authority and being unsuccessful there, went in further appeal before the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal.
5. During the pendency of assessee’s appeal, based on the additions made, the A.O.
initiated proceedings for imposition of penalty u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Act and ultimately
passed an order on 19.09.2025, imposing penalty of Rs.76,45,696/-. The penalty so
imposed by the A.O. was also confirmed by the first appellate authority.
6. Before us, ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that while deciding the
quantum appeal of the assessee, the Tribunal, in order dated 23.12.2025 passed in ITA No.
6469/Mum/2025, has set aside the issues relating to both the additions back to the A.O. for
fresh adjudication. Thus, he submitted, as on date there is no surviving addition to impose
penalty u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Act.
7. The ld. Departmental Representative (ld. DR for short) could not controvert the
aforesaid factual position.
8. Having considered rival submissions and perused the materials on record, we find
that the additions based on which the A.O. had imposed penalty u/s. 271AAC(1) of the
##PAGE3##3
ITA No. 7497/Mum/2025 (A.Y.2018-19)
Zebra Networks Private Limited vs. ITO
Act, in the meanwhile, have been set aside by the co-ordinate bench while deciding
assessee’s appeal in quantum proceeding with a direction to the A.O. to decide the issues
afresh after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Thus,
by virtue of such decision of the co-ordinate bench, there is no surviving addition on which
the penalty-imposed u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Act can be sustained. That being the factual
position on record, we are inclined to set aside the impugned orders passed by the A.O. and
the first appellate authority and restore the issue relating to the imposition of penalty to the
A.O. It will be open to the A.O. to initiate proceedings u/s. 271AAC(1) of the Act afresh,
if warranted, depending upon the outcome of the fresh assessment.
9. In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28.01.2026
Sd/- Sd/-
(Arun Khodpia) (Saktijit Dey)
Accountant Member Vice President
Mumbai; Dated : 28.01.2026
Roshani, Sr. PS
Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent
3. The CIT(A)
4. C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.