SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 2469

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
INCOME TAX OFFICER PANIPAT – Appellant
Versus
RAJNI CHOPRA PANIPAT – Respondent


ORDER

This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082622847(1), dated 14.11.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2. It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from both the parties there arises the first and foremost legal issue of validity of impugned section 148A(d) proceedings herein itself initiated vide notice dated 23.04.2021 in assessment year 2017-18. This is for the precise reason that the learned Assessing Authority had obtained the necessary approval from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak, than the prescribed authority under section 151(ii) of the Act i.e. Principal Chief Commissioner or……………………., if more than three years have elapsed from the end of the relevant previous year. This clinching factual position has gone unrebutted from the Revenue side. Faced with this situation, we find that the hon’ble jurisdictional high court in Communist Par

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top