INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
INCOME TAX OFFICER DELHI – Appellant
Versus
RATNA AGGARWAL DELHI – Respondent
ITA 21/DEL/2025[2018-19]
##PAGE1##
P a ge | 1
ITA No.21/Del/2025
Ratna Aggarwal (AY: 2018-19)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“A” BENCH, DELHI
BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER &
SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.21/Del/2025
(Assessment Year: 2018-19)
Income Tax Officer Vs. Ratna Aggarwal
Room No. 1210, E-2, Krishna Nagar,
Block, Civic Center, New Delhi – 110051
Minto Road,
New Delhi – 110002
(cid:1)थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AEFPA6066B
Appellant .. Respondent
Appellant by : Sh. Mayank Patawali, Adv.
Sh. Akash Ojha, Adv.
Respondent by : Sh. Krishna Kumar Ramawat, Sr.
DR
Date of Hearing 01.12.2025
Date of Pronouncement 04.02.2026
O R D E R
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the revenue against the order dated
04.11.2024 of the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi
(hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’)
##PAGE2##P a ge | 2
ITA No.21/Del/2025
Ratna Aggarwal (AY: 2018-19)
in DIN & Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070080500(1) arising out
of the assessment order dated 09.02.2024 u/s 147 r.w.s 144 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by the Assessment
Unit, Income Tax Department, for AY: 2018-19.
2. The assessee is an individual and filed return declaring income of
Rs.3,40,540/- and subsequently case was reopened on the ground that
assessee has received an immovable property by way of gifts deed amounting
to Rs.33,43,440/- it did not fall in the definition of specified relatives as
defined in Section 56(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee filed return
and declared an amount of Rs.303,43,440/- income from other sources later
on during reassessment proceeding assessee revised computation claiming
that the said property were received by her in family settlement and therefore
the value of the property is not taxable, however, AO did not agree and made
addition of the same.
3. The case of the assessee is that immovable property was received by
Shri Rajiv Agarwal by way of registered gift deed executed on 12.06.2017 of
value of Rs.303,43,440/- and the said transaction does not file in the
##PAGE3##P a ge | 3
ITA No.21/Del/2025
Ratna Aggarwal (AY: 2018-19)
definition of specified relatives in Section 56(2) of the Act and was actually
by way of family settlement it has come in the hands of assessee. The
transaction was carried out between the assessee and her brother in law Mr.
Ravi Agarwal son of late Shri A.D. Agarwal who was real brother of late Shri
Sahdev Prasad (father in law of assessee). Shri A.D. Agarwal in his dying
wish has desired to gift some shares of his property to the family of his
brother late Shri Sahdev Prasad and the same was pursued by his son Dr.
Ravi Agarwal who is reputed doctor and a Non-Resident Indian settled in
USA for last 36 years. Ravi Agarwal in order to own the wish of his father
registered the property M-142, 1st Floor, Kailash Part II, Delhi in the name of
assessee by way of family settlement. It was claimed by the assessee that
inadvertently while filing return in reopening assessment the value of the
property was shown as income from other sources under wrong advice,
therefore, revised computation was filed. It comes up from the submission
which are made before Ld. CIT(A) that the claim of the assessee was also
that late Shri A.D. Agarwal has purchased the property with contribution
coming up from late Shri Sahdev Prasad Aggarwal who was real brother of
##PAGE4##P a ge | 4
ITA No.21/Del/2025
Ratna Aggarwal (AY: 2018-19)
Shri A.D. Aggarwal and father in law of assessee. Thus in a way pleading it
to be a joint hindu family property.
4. The assessee had succeeded before the Ld. CIT(A) as ld. CIT(A)
considered the family settlement/family arrangement to be a genuine
transaction and observed that AO has not made any adverse remark about the
same thereby the allegation by way of registered gift deed was not ‘transfer’
as defined u/s 2(47) of the Act.
5. The thrust of contention of ld. DR was on the assertion that story of
family settlement is a concocted story a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.