SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 2724

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (RAIPUR BENCH)
ANIL AGRAWAL SAKTI – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE BILASPUR CENTRAL CIRCLE BILASPUR – Respondent


आदेश/ORDER 

Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, AM:

This appeal for Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2018-19 filed by the assessee is directed against the order, dated 08.03.2025, passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Bhopal [‘PCIT(C)’]. Further, the assessee has also file a Stay Application (‘SA’) with request to stay the consequential assessment proceedings initiated in pursuance of the order passed under section 263 of the Act by the Ld. PCIT(C).

2. The appellant assessee vide sole ground, read as “The order passed by the PCIT is bad in law, passed without satisfying the conditions mentioned in explanation 2 of the sec 263”, has challenged the validity of the impugned order.

3. The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal are that the appellant assessee filed his original Income Tax Return (‘ITR’) of the relevant year on 29.12.2018 declaring income of Rs.7,95,750/-. The assessee had bought a property; i.e. the land admeasuring 0.405 Hectare having Khasra No.1291/2 Sakti Tehsil for Rs.18,00,000/-; however, he had paid stamp duty on the market value of Rs.46,33,000/- the said property determined by the Stamp Valuation Authorit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top