INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (BANGALORE BENCH)
SAIKAT CHINMAY BHATTACHARYA MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
DY. CIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE 1(1) BANGALORE – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI,VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(IT)A No.582/Bang/2025 Assessment Year : 2015-16 Saikat Chinmay Bhattacharya A-74, Maker Kundan Gardens Juhu Rx Opp Ltdo Cinema DCIT Santacruz Vs. International tax, Mumbai 400 049 Circle 1(1)
Bangalore PAN NO : AADPB5450C APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : CA Darshit Naik, A.R.
Respondent by : Dr. Divya K.J, CIT D.R.
Date of Hearing : 22.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 16.02.2026
O R D E R
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Intl. Taxation, Circle-1(1), Bengaluru dated 27/01/2025 vide DIN and Order No: ITBA/AST/S/147/2024-25/1072580233(1) passed u/s. 147 r.w.s 144C(13) of the income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) for the AY
2015-16.
2. The assessee has raised the following Grounds of appeal:-
1. The Learned Assessing Officer has erred, in Law and on Facts, in assessing income of your Appellant at Rs.79,24,880/- as against returned income of Rs.2,54,880/-.
2. The Learned Assessing Officer erred in making an addition of Rs.76,70,000/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.