INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JABALPUR BENCH)
Anadee Nath Misshra, Accountant Member
Vicky Navani – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) – Respondent
ORDER
(A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.124/JBP/2024 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2016-17 against impugned appellate order dated 28.04.2024 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1064410436(1) of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for short].
(B) This appeal has been filed by the assessee, beyond time limit prescribed under section 253(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”, for short). The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal. In view of the foregoing, and in specific facts and circumstances of the present appeal before us, the delay in filing of this appeal is condoned; and the appeal is admitted for hearing.
(B.1) In this case, order under section 271B of the I.T. Act was passed by the Assessing Officer (“AO”, for short) levying penalty amounting to Rs.1,50,000/-, by the AO vide order dated 28.03.2019 passed u/s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.