SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 8595

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SAMEER SUBHASH HOSMANI MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 35(3)(1) MUMBAI MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K(SMC)” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2412/MUM/2024 (Assessment Year : 2013–14)

SAMEER SUBHASH HOSMANI, Flat no. 1, Shreenath Dham, W.S. Road, Opp. Jana Seva Bank, Dahisar East, Mumbai - 400068 ……………. Appellant Maharashtra PAN: ADIPH3121L v/s ITO, Ward 35(3)(1), Mumbai Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai - 400051 ……………. Respondent Maharashtra Assessee by : Ms. Rakhi Dholakiya, CA Revenue by : Shri Kiran Unavekar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing – 13/02/2025 Date of Order – 14/02/2025

O R D E R

PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 05/03/2024, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Gurugram [“learned Addl./Joint CIT(A)”], for the Assessment Year 2013-14.

2. In this appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds: -

“1. The learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer.

2. The learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the additio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top