INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SAMEER SUBHASH HOSMANI MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 35(3)(1) MUMBAI MUMBAI – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K(SMC)” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2412/MUM/2024 (Assessment Year : 2013–14)
SAMEER SUBHASH HOSMANI, Flat no. 1, Shreenath Dham, W.S. Road, Opp. Jana Seva Bank, Dahisar East, Mumbai - 400068 ……………. Appellant Maharashtra PAN: ADIPH3121L v/s ITO, Ward 35(3)(1), Mumbai Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai - 400051 ……………. Respondent Maharashtra Assessee by : Ms. Rakhi Dholakiya, CA Revenue by : Shri Kiran Unavekar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing – 13/02/2025 Date of Order – 14/02/2025
O R D E R
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M.
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 05/03/2024, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Gurugram [“learned Addl./Joint CIT(A)”], for the Assessment Year 2013-14.
2. In this appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds: -
“1. The learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer.
2. The learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the additio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.