SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 8977

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
DHANANJAY SANJIV RAWAL MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 17(2)(1) MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “J (SMC)” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM &

MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 39/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2020-21)

Dhananjay Sanjiv Rawal, Central Processing Centre, D-4, Iconic, 18, Arthur Bunder Income Tax Department, Vs.

Road, Colaba, Mumbai-400005 Bangalore-560500 PAN: AGPPR5062A Appellant) : Respondent Appellant /Assessee by : Shri Dhananjay Rawal, AR Revenue / Respondent by : Shri Asif Karmali, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 11.02.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 21.02.2025 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S, AM:

This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)- Delhi [for short 'the CIT(A)] dated 27.03.2023 for the AY 2020-21. The only issue contended by the assessee through various grounds is that the AO has not been given the credit towards tax deducted on the payments received by the assessee for the reason that the same is not appear in the Form-26AS.

2. The assessee an individual is a creative director by profession and filed the return of income for AY 2020-21 on 14.12.2020 declaring a total income of Rs. 16,81,030/-. The assessee in the return has claimed a TDS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top