INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SURAT BENCH)
KAMLESHKUMAR DHANSUKHLAL PATEL VALSAD – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 2 VALSAD – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 890/SRT/2025 (Assessment Year: 2020-21)
Kamleshkumar Dhansukhlal Patel, Income Tax Officer, Vs.
At. Post Barsol, Tal. Dharampur, Ward 2, Dist. Valsad-396001 Valsad [PAN : AOSPP 6124 J]
(Appellant) .. (Respondent Appellant represented by : Shri Suresh K. Kabra, CA Respondent represented by: Shri Ashish Kumar, Sr DR Date of Hearing 22.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement 17.02.2026
O R D E R
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:-
Delay condoned.
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated
25.03.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)” for short), under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act” for short) for Assessment Year 2020-21.
2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal :-
“The Ld. CIT(A) has erred and was not just and proper on the facts of the case and in law in confirming the addition of Rs.66,52,171/- on A/c of Agriculture Income. Wrongly declared for typographic mistake
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.