INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JAIPUR BENCH)
SHREE AURO IRON LIMITED JAIPUR – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I JAIPUR – Respondent
vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj U;k;ihB] t;iqj IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk
0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh xxu xks;y] ys[kk lnL;] ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 788/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2016-17 Shree Auro Iron Limited, cuke Principal Commissioner of
11, Dudu Bagh, Vs. Income-tax-I, Loha Mandi S.C. Link Road, Jaipur.
Jaipur.
LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@
PAN/GIR No. AAECS 0826 R vihykFkhZ@ Appellant izR;FkhZ@
Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Pravin Saraswant, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing: 23/01/2025 ?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 12/03/2025 vkns'k@
ORDER PER DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M.
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld.
PCIT, Jaipur-1 dated 28.03.2024 passed under section 263 of the I.T. Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2016-17. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :-
1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. PCIT grossly erred in passing an order u/s 263 of the Act, ignoring the detailed submissio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.