INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AGRA BENCH)
PIYUSH KUMAR BAGLA HATHRAS – Appellant
Versus
JURISDICTION ASSESSING OFFICER WD.-4(3)(4) HATHRAS – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, AGRA BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No. 43/Agr/2021 (िनधा(cid:330)रणवष(cid:330) / Assessment Year: 2018-19)
Shri Piyush Kumar Bagla ITO, NFAC बनाम/
2, Court of Wards Compound Delhi Vs.
Aligarh (cid:830)थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.AGQPB-8087-J (अपीलाथ५/Appellant) : (ঋ(cid:529)थ५ / Respondent)
अपीलाथ५कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Deepak (Advocate) - Ld. AR ঋ(cid:529)थ५कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri Shailendra Shrivastava – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 12-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 28-03-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 12-04-2021 in the matter of an intimation issued by CPC u/s 143(1) on 21-05-2019. Having heard rival submissions, the appeal is disposed-off as under.
2. From impugned order, it could be seen that the assessee sold 4 properties during the year and reflected Long Term Capital Gains of Rs.12.15 Lacs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.