IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

AND SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

I.T.A. No.865/Mum/2025 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Pratap Nagnaji Rajgor Vs. ITO 19(3)(1) Mumbai Room No. 94, 2^nd Floor, Matrumandir, Tardeo Badrika Ashram Bldg., 1st Mumbai 40007.

Khetwadi Lane, Mumbai

400004.

PAN: AAAPR7926C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Appellant by Shri. Prakash Pandit Respondent by Shri. Mukesh Thakwani SR. D.R.

Date of Hearing 24.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement 28.03.2025

ORDER

Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.:

The present penalty appeal filed by the assessee arises out of order dated 18/12/2024 passed by NFAC, Delhi for Assessment Year

2009-10 on following grounds of appeal:

1. “In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming penalty of Rs. 6,17,790/- under section

271(1)(c) of the Act levied by the AO.

2. Reasons given by the CIT(A) for confirming penalty of Rs. 6,17,790/-

under section 271(1)(c) of the Act levied by the AO are wrong,

insufficient, and contrary to the facts and evidence on record.

3. he assessee craves leave to add, amend, alter, modify or omit any of

the aforesaid Grounds of Appeal