SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 11471

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JAIPUR BENCH)
SMT. ANARO DEVI ALWAR – Appellant
Versus
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER ALWAR – Respondent


vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj U;k;ihB] t;iqj IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A-Bench” JAIPUR Jh xxu xks;y] ys[kk lnL; ,oa Jh ujsUn dqekj] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 341/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2014-15 Smt. Anaro Devi cuke The Income Tax Officer, W/o Sh. Madan Lal, Post Baghana, Vs. Alwar.

Village- Kasimpur, Tehsil- Kotkasim, Alwar.

LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.:BSAPD0291F vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Tarun Mittal, C.A.

jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-DR.

lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing :17/04/2025 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 21/04/2025 vkns'k@ORDER PER: NARINDER KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER .

Present appeal has been filed against order dated 24.01.2024 passed by Learned CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi.

Vide impugned order, Learned CIT(A) has partly allowed the appeal which was filed by her challenging assessment order dated 24.12.2019, passed by the Assessing Officer, relating to the assessment year 2014-15.

2. The Assessing Officer made following two additions:-

 Unexplained investment in property

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top