SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 13014

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JAIPUR BENCH)
GCK STOCK PRIVATE LIMITED JAIPUR – Appellant
Versus
ITO WD 1(4) JAIPUR JAIPUR – Respondent


vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj U;k;ihB] t;iqj IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Mk

0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh xxu xks;y] ys[kk lnL;] ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1572/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2015-16 GCK Stock Private Limited cuke The ITO, 135, Everest Vihar, T.N. Mishra Marg, Vs. Ward-1(4), Shyam Nagar Brijlal Pura, Jaipur. Jaipur.

LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAACA5560C vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Bhupendra Shaha, C.A.

jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by : Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing : 24/02/2025 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 06/05/2025 vkns'k@ORDER PER DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT (A), NFAC, Delhi dated 27.12.2024 passed under section 250 of the I.T. Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2015-16.

2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :-

“1. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Assessing Officer erred in passing order u/s 148A[d] r w s 148 r w s 144B a) Mechani

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top