SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 17355

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (LUCKNOW BENCH)
SARJOO PRASAD RAJPAT KANPUR – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(1)(4) KANPUR – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW ‘B’ BENCH, LUCKNOW BEFORE SH. SUBHASH MALGURIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER A.Y. 2009-10 M/s Sarjoo Prasad Rajpat vs. ITO-1(1)(4), PAN:AAFFS5661Q

55/15, Kahoo Kothi, Kanpur 16/69/ Kanpur (Appellant) (Respondent)

Assessee by: Sh. Pradeep Kumar Sahgal, Advocate Revenue by: Sh. Deepak Yadav, DR Date of hearing: 02.06 .2025 Date of pronouncement: O2 4R. 0D7 E.2 0R2 5 PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.:

[

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 13.03.2024 wherein the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee against the order under section 154 passed“ 1b.y T thhaet ltdh.e A oOrd oenr i2n5 a.0p4pe.2a0l 1pa8s. sTehd eb yg rtohue nLdds C oITf (aAp)p, NeaFlA aCr ies absa du nind elarw:- and facts and deserves to be quashed by allowing the appeal.

2. That the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC under the facts and circumstances of the case has erred in law and in facts, in upholding the order of Ld. AO in rejecting the application made under section 154 of the Act.

3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case of the appellant, the L

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top