INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
AJIT KUNDANMALJI JAIN MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 20(1)(1) MUMBAI – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 4456/MUM/2025(A.Y: 2017-18)
AjitKundanmalji Jain ITO Ward 20(1)(1), 1/35, 29B Tarachand Building, D. N. R. No. 124, 1st floor, Piramal Singh Road, Love Lane, Mazgaon, Vs. Chamber, Lalbaug, Mumbai-
Mumbai-400 010 400 012.
PAN: ADYPJ1496Q (Appellant) (Respondent)
Assessee Represented by : Ms. Neha Paranjpe, Ld. AR Department Represented by : ShriKiran K. Chhatrapati, Ld. DR Date of conclusion of Hearing : 14.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 21.08.2025
O R D E R
PER RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (J.M.):
1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/assessee against the orderof Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / Addl/ JCIT(A), Mysore [hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”],passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”] dated
28.10.2024for the A.Y. 2017-18 wherein the appeal of the assessee was dismissed ex-parte for non prosecution of the case by the assessee as the assessee has failed to respond to the notices issued on various dates as mentioned in para 4 of the impugned order.
2. The brief fact
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.