INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
PAVAN VITTHAL GAIKWAD MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MUMBAI – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 3527/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year: 2020-2021)
Pavan Vitthal Gaikwad C-704, Nightingle CHS., Opp Try Ice Cream, Behind Saraswat Bank, Mumbai - 400067 [PAN: ANNPG7561J] …………. Appellant Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Room No. 418, Piramal Chamber, Lalbaug, Parel, Mumbai - 400012 …………. Respondent Appearance For the Appellant/Department : None For the Respondent/Assessee : Shri. R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR Date Conclusion of hearing : 25.08.2025 Pronouncement of order : 28.08.2025
O R D E R
[
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
1. The present appeal preferred by the Assessee is directed against the Order, dated 24/03/2025, passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai-20 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the PCIT’] whereby the Assessment Order, dated 09/01/2021, passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2020-2021 subjected to revision under Section 263 of the Act.
2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal :
“1. In law and facts and circumstances of the case, The Principal Commissioner of Inco
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.