SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 19070

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
PAVAN VITTHAL GAIKWAD MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 3527/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year: 2020-2021)

Pavan Vitthal Gaikwad C-704, Nightingle CHS., Opp Try Ice Cream, Behind Saraswat Bank, Mumbai - 400067 [PAN: ANNPG7561J] …………. Appellant Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Room No. 418, Piramal Chamber, Lalbaug, Parel, Mumbai - 400012 …………. Respondent Appearance For the Appellant/Department : None For the Respondent/Assessee : Shri. R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR Date Conclusion of hearing : 25.08.2025 Pronouncement of order : 28.08.2025

O R D E R

[

Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:

1. The present appeal preferred by the Assessee is directed against the Order, dated 24/03/2025, passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai-20 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the PCIT’] whereby the Assessment Order, dated 09/01/2021, passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2020-2021 subjected to revision under Section 263 of the Act.

2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal :

“1. In law and facts and circumstances of the case, The Principal Commissioner of Inco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top