SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 19628

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JAIPUR BENCH)
DUBBI GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD DAUSA – Appellant
Versus
ITO WD DAUSA – Respondent


`vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj U;k;ihB] t;iqj IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk

0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ dey's k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@

ITA. No. 1283/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@

Assessment Years : 2018-19 Dubbi Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti cuke The ITO, Ltd. Vs. Ward- Dausa.

Sikrai, Dausa.

LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAALD1199B vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@

Assessee by : Shri Anoop Bhatia, C.A.

jktLo dh vksj ls Revenue by : Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR (V.C.)

lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@

Date of Hearing : 30/06/2025 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 09/09/2025 vkns'k@ ORDER PER DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the Revisional order dated 12.12.2023, passed by the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Jaipur-1, for the assessment year 2018-19.

2. The assessee has raised following grounds:–

“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. Pr.CIT has erred in law as well as on facts in invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Act, and therefore the impugned order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top