SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 19837

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
VINOD JINDAL FARIDABAD HARYANA – Appellant
Versus
DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 FARIDABAD HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ../ .I.T.A Nos.1918, 1919, 1920, 1921 & 1923/Del/2025 िनधा(cid:9)रणवष(cid:9)/Assessment Years:2013-14 to 2017-18 SHRI VINOD JINDAL, बनाम DCIT, H.No.1203A, Tower C-3, Vs. Central Circle-2, SRS Pearl Heights, Faridabad.

Sector-87, Faridabad.

PAN No.AENPJ1202Q अपीलाथ(cid:20) Appellant (cid:22)(cid:23)यथ(cid:20)/Respondent Assessee by Shri Deepesh Garg, Advocate Revenue by Shri Sahil Kumar Bansal, Sr. DR सनु वाईक(cid:8)तारीख/ Date of hearing: 28.08.2025 उ(cid:14)ोषणाक(cid:8)तारीख/Pronouncement on 12.09.2025 आदेश /O R D E R PER BENCH The appeals in ITA 1918 to 1921/Del/2025 are filed by the assessee against the order u/s 250 of the Act, NFAC, Delhi dated 28.01.2025 for the AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17 in sustaining the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. The appeal in ITA No.1923/Del/2025 is filed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in sustaining penalty u/s 270A of the Act for AY 2017-18.

2. Ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submits that penalty orders passed u/s 271(1)(c) & 270A are invalid and bad in law for the reason

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top