INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
VINOD JINDAL FARIDABAD HARYANA – Appellant
Versus
DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 FARIDABAD HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.स/ं .I.T.A Nos.1918, 1919, 1920, 1921 & 1923/Del/2025 िनधा(cid:9)रणवष(cid:9)/Assessment Years:2013-14 to 2017-18 SHRI VINOD JINDAL, बनाम DCIT, H.No.1203A, Tower C-3, Vs. Central Circle-2, SRS Pearl Heights, Faridabad.
Sector-87, Faridabad.
PAN No.AENPJ1202Q अपीलाथ(cid:20) Appellant (cid:22)(cid:23)यथ(cid:20)/Respondent Assessee by Shri Deepesh Garg, Advocate Revenue by Shri Sahil Kumar Bansal, Sr. DR सनु वाईक(cid:8)तारीख/ Date of hearing: 28.08.2025 उ(cid:14)ोषणाक(cid:8)तारीख/Pronouncement on 12.09.2025 आदेश /O R D E R PER BENCH The appeals in ITA 1918 to 1921/Del/2025 are filed by the assessee against the order u/s 250 of the Act, NFAC, Delhi dated 28.01.2025 for the AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17 in sustaining the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. The appeal in ITA No.1923/Del/2025 is filed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in sustaining penalty u/s 270A of the Act for AY 2017-18.
2. Ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submits that penalty orders passed u/s 271(1)(c) & 270A are invalid and bad in law for the reason
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.