SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 20636

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (RAIPUR BENCH)
MANOJ KUMAR SAHU DURG DURG – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD-2(1) BHILAI DURG – Respondent


आयकर अपील(cid:547)य अ(cid:876)धकरण Ûयायपीठ “एक-सदèय” मामला रायपरु म(cid:581)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR (cid:302)ी पाथ (cid:91) सारथी चौधर(cid:547), Ûया(cid:467)यक सदèय के सम¢

BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.475/RPR/2025 (cid:467)नधा(cid:91)रण वष (cid:91) /Assessment Year : 2013-14 Manoj Kumar Sahu

151, Village: Rajpur, Tehsil: Dhamdha, Dist. Durg-491 331 (C.G.)

PAN: EOMPS2921J .......अपीलाथ(cid:568) / Appellant बनाम / V/s.

The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Bhilai (C.G.) ……(cid:292)×यथ(cid:568) / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Yogesh Sethia, CA Revenue by : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR सुनवाई क(cid:551) तार(cid:547)ख / Date of Hearing : 23.09.2025 घोषणा क(cid:551) तार(cid:547)ख / Date of Pronouncement : 23.09.2025 आदेश / ORDER PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 02.09.2024 for the assessment year 2013-14 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2. At the very outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the present appeal is time barred by 244 days. Elaborating the reasons leading to the said del

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top